Marcion: Divergent Perspectives in Against Heresies and Philosophumena
Irenaeus's Against Heresies
In Against Heresies (1.27.1), Irenaeus provides a detailed critique of Marcion and his predecessor, Cerdo. According to Irenaeus, Cerdo, who was influenced by the followers of Simon Magus, arrived in Rome during the episcopacy of Hyginus. Cerdo taught a dualistic theology, distinguishing between the God of the Old Testament (whom he considered just but known) and the God of the New Testament (whom he viewed as good but previously unknown).
Marcion, a follower of Cerdo, expanded upon this dualism. He declared the God of the Old Testament to be the author of evil, delighting in war and inconsistent in purpose. In contrast, Jesus was sent by a higher, benevolent deity, distinct from the creator god of the material world. Marcion's radical theology included the rejection of the Old Testament and the substantial alteration of the New Testament. He purportedly edited the Gospel of Luke and the Pauline epistles to align with his doctrines, removing references that affirmed the Old Testament God as the Father of Jesus Christ.
Key Points from Irenaeus:
- Dualism: Marcion taught a strict separation between the just, known God of the Old Testament and the good, unknown God of the New Testament.
- Scriptural Alteration: Marcion heavily edited the Gospel of Luke and the Pauline epistles to support his theological views.
- Anti-Judaism: He vehemently opposed the Mosaic Law and the prophets, seeing them as representatives of the inferior creator god.
Philosophumena (Hippolytus of Rome)
The Philosophumena, often attributed to Hippolytus, offers a different angle on Marcion's teachings. This work acknowledges the influence of earlier philosophies on Marcion, particularly the ideas of Empedocles. The Philosophumena criticizes Marcion for adopting and adapting these philosophical concepts into his Christian framework.
Key Points from Philosophumena:
- Philosophical Roots: Marcion's doctrines are linked to the ideas of Empedocles, particularly the dualistic struggle between good (Friendship) and evil (Discord).
- Scriptural Use: Unlike Irenaeus, the Philosophumena suggests Marcion used the Gospel of Mark rather than Luke.
- Mysticism and Ethics: Marcion's rejection of marriage and certain foods is seen as an adoption of Empedoclean purificatory rites, aiming to avoid the entanglement of souls in material bodies.
Comparative Analysis
Source and Influence
- Irenaeus frames Marcion primarily within the context of Christian heresy, tracing his ideas through a succession of teachers and emphasizing his deviation from orthodox Christian teachings.
- Philosophumena presents Marcion as a synthesizer of Greek philosophical concepts, particularly those of Empedocles, into his theological system.
Scriptural Canon
- Irenaeus asserts that Marcion edited the Gospel of Luke and the Pauline epistles to suit his theology.
- Philosophumena suggests Marcion's canon included an altered version of the Gospel of Mark, reflecting a different textual tradition.
Ethical and Ritual Practices
- Irenaeus focuses on Marcion's theological deviations, especially his rejection of the Old Testament.
- Philosophumena highlights Marcion's ethical practices, such as his rejection of marriage and certain dietary laws, as influenced by Empedoclean philosophy.
Conclusion
Marcion's influence on early Christianity cannot be overstated. His radical dualism and scriptural revisions posed significant challenges to early Christian orthodoxy, prompting extensive rebuttals from figures like Irenaeus and Hippolytus. While Against Heresies and the Philosophumena offer differing perspectives on Marcion's sources and the specifics of his doctrines, they collectively underscore the complexity and far-reaching impact of his thought on the development of Christian theology. By examining these sources, we gain a deeper understanding of the diverse and contentious landscape of early Christian doctrinal development.
Comments
Post a Comment