The Case of the Unusual Ligature: Reassessing the Letter to Theodore
The Unusual Ligature for νος
In every instance of the ending νος within the Letter to Theodore, the scribe employs a distinctive ligature that connects the nu (ν) with the sigma (ς). This ligature is consistent and appears throughout the manuscript, suggesting it was a standard practice for the scribe. The presence of this ligature becomes particularly significant when examining the controversial term γυμνὸς (gymnos) versus γυμνοὶ (gymnoi).
The Hypothetical Forgery Theory
Let us entertain the hypothesis proposed by some forgery theorists that Morton Smith meticulously added layers of nuance to the manuscript to make it appear authentic. According to this theory, Smith might have deliberately chosen not to use the ligature in the word γυμνὸς to create a deviation from the norm. However, this leads to a significant issue. If Smith had intended to create an authentic-looking manuscript, why would he introduce an inconsistency in the application of the ligature, especially when such precision was otherwise maintained?
The Precision of Accented Vowels
One of the most compelling arguments against the forgery hypothesis is the remarkable precision with which the scribe accentuated vowels throughout the Letter to Theodore. In post-Byzantine manuscripts, it is common to find mis-accented letters where the accent appears so far to the right of the intended vowel that it seems to be on the following consonant. However, this is not the case in the Letter to Theodore.
Figure 14 illustrates the scribe's impeccable accuracy in placing accents. Of the four hundred and eighty instances of vowels receiving an acute or grave accent, each one is correctly placed. This level of precision is extraordinary, especially when compared to contemporary manuscripts where such accuracy is rare.
The Dilemma of the Forger
Given the high level of precision in the manuscript, the forgery theory encounters a significant dilemma. If Morton Smith had forged the manuscript, he would have had to account for the scribe's consistent use of ligatures and precise accentuation. To maintain consistency, Smith would either have to:
- Write γυμνὸς using the attached ligature for ος, consistent with the other instances of νος.
- Introduce mis-accented vowels throughout the manuscript to justify any deviation in the writing of γυμνὸς as γυμνοὶ.
Smith did neither. The manuscript consistently uses the ligature for νος and accurately places accents on vowels, with no instances of mis-accented letters.
Conclusion: A Strong Case for Authenticity
The lack of mis-accented vowels and the consistent use of the ligature for νος present a compelling argument against the manuscript being a forgery. The forger would have needed to maintain an implausible level of consistency in these aspects, something that even genuine scribes of the period struggled to achieve.
Therefore, it seems reasonable to conclude that the Letter to Theodore, given its meticulous scribing practices and internal consistency, is unlikely to be a modern forgery. The evidence points towards authenticity, underscoring the need for careful and context-aware analysis in the ongoing examination of historical manuscripts.
Comments
Post a Comment