New "Deep Dive" Podcast Episode 13: Is the End of the Manuscript Discovered by Morton Smith the End of the Original Manuscript of Clement's Letter? (Part Two)


Podcast 13 

Summary 

This article argues that the ending of Clement of Alexandria's Stromateis and his Letter to Theodore were originally intended to be abrupt and open-ended. The author uses textual analysis to show that Clement deliberately employed this style to protect the deeper meaning of his writings from those who were not ready for it. This deliberate obscurity is further demonstrated by Clement's use of the term "passerby" (τῷ περιτυχόντι), which refers to those who are not yet fully initiated into the Christian faith. The article concludes by emphasizing the importance of studying these texts in their own right and considering the methods early Christian theologians used to convey their ideas.

Here are some of the key textual features that distinguish Clement of Alexandria's works and how those features reflect his approach to theological pedagogy, based on the provided source: 

● Clement's writings are characterized by a scattered and diffuse style, intentionally designed to conceal deeper truths from the uninitiated. He believed that presenting complex theological concepts in a straightforward manner could be detrimental to those who were not yet ready to receive them. This approach is evident in his promise to scatter "sparks of the doctrines of true knowledge" throughout his work. This method ensured that only those who were genuinely seeking deeper understanding would be able to piece together the full extent of his teachings. 

● Clement's use of seemingly abrupt endings, as seen in both Stromateis and Letter to Theodore, serves as a textual feature that reinforces his pedagogical approach. These endings were not accidental but rather deliberate choices meant to protect the sacred mysteries contained within his writings from those who might misunderstand or misinterpret them. This technique is consistent with his overall strategy of veiling profound theological truths and making them accessible only to those who had demonstrated the necessary commitment and preparation. 

● Clement's practice of minimal commentary, particularly evident in his handling of the Secret Gospel of Mark in the Letter to Theodore, is another important textual feature. This approach suggests that he believed in the power of the text to speak for itself and that excessive explanation could hinder rather than help the reader's understanding. By presenting the text with minimal interpretation, Clement aimed to encourage his audience to engage directly with the source material and draw their own conclusions. 

These features reflect Clement's approach to theological pedagogy, which emphasized gradual revelation and active engagement from his audience. He believed in guiding his readers through a carefully constructed labyrinth of knowledge, ensuring that they were adequately prepared for the profound truths they would encounter.

Comments